Assessment of Level of Fear in Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Urogynecologic and Gynecologic Procedures and Surgeries During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using the Validated Surgical Fear Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and trend fears surrounding elective surgery and office procedures in benign gynecologic and urogynecologic patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Recruitment occurred from June 23, 2020, to March 23, 2021. Females 18 years or older presenting for elective benign gynecologic or urogynecologic surgery or office procedures were eligible. Patients were excluded if non-English speaking or undergoing an emergent procedure or surgery. Fear was assessed by the Surgical Fear Questionnaire (SFQ), which was also modified to include 2-4 additional questions pertaining to COVID-19 (modified version of the Surgical Fear Questionnaire [mSFQ]). Total SFQ scores and short- and long-term fear scores were compared between procedures and surgery and to historic data. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients undergoing 107 procedures or 102 surgical procedures completed the questionnaire. Participants were separated into subgroups determined by the timing of questionnaire completion related to phases of the pandemic. The most common procedure was urodynamics (n = 59 [55%]). The most common elective surgical procedure was hysterectomy (n = 59 [57.8%]). Furthermore, 72.5% of surgical procedures were for urogynecologic indications.Fear levels were low and not different in patients undergoing procedures versus surgery (12.38 ± 12.44 vs 12.03 ± 16.01, P = 0.958). There was no difference between procedures versus surgery for short- (6.21 ± 8.38 vs 6.81 ± 8.44, P = 0.726) or long-term fear (6.18 ± 8.89 vs 5.22 ± 8.20, P = 0.683). Compared with historic data, our hysterectomy patients had less surgical fear. The mSFQ demonstrated higher fear scores for both procedures and surgery (mSFQ, 20.57 ± 20.55 for procedures; 28.78 ± 28.51 for surgery). There were no significant fluctuations in SFQ score in relation to critical COVID-19 events. CONCLUSIONS: Fear of surgery and office procedures was low and consistent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than historic data.

Single-nucleotide conservation state annotation of the SARS-CoV-2 genome.

Given the global impact and severity of COVID-19, there is a pressing need for a better understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and mutations. Multi-strain sequence alignments of coronaviruses (CoV) provide important information for interpreting the genome and its variation. We apply a comparative genomics method, ConsHMM, to the multi-strain alignments of CoV to annotate every base of the SARS-CoV-2 genome with conservation states based on sequence alignment patterns among CoV. The learned conservation states show distinct enrichment patterns for genes, protein domains, and other regions of interest. Certain states are strongly enriched or depleted of SARS-CoV-2 mutations, which can be used to predict potentially consequential mutations. We expect the conservation states to be a resource for interpreting the SARS-CoV-2 genome and mutations.

Which Country is Truly Developed? COVID-19 has Answered the Question.

The developed countries of the world were ill-prepared for the pandemic that they have suffered. When we compare developed to developing countries, the sophisticated parameters we use do not necessarily address the weaknesses in the healthcare systems of developed countries that make them susceptible to crises like the present pandemic. We strongly suggest that better preparation for such events is necessary for a country to be considered developed.